The Norwegian court has sentenced the Indian couple,
Chandrasekhar Vallabhaneni and Anupama, for 18 and 15 months’ imprisonment
respectively for alleged maltreatment of their 7 year old son. The prosecution case
is that the child was constantly abused on one issue or other starting from
years back and subjected to constant reprimands, flogging with belt and burning
his legs and tongue with hot metal objects.
This is a 2nd case of charging Indian couples for
abuse of children in Norway. The first case ended almost in the separation of
the couple and it is not fully clear whether the child’s mother had any
problems earlier or whether it was from the mental shock when the children were
snatched from her forcefully. Norway alleged that the mother was not normal.
Norway considers
children as their valued citizens and takes a pro-active role in protecting
them. The responsibility of child protection is entrusted with the ‘child
protection service’ under the Municipality. The teachers, Doctors, nurses etc
who get in touch with children constantly are advised to report abuse of
children to the Municipal child protection service. Once they get a report they
investigate the matter thoroughly and decide the course of action to take. In
certain cases an advice and guidance would be enough. In cases of constant
flogging or other abuses the service men take away the child and entrust with a
foster mother simultaneously charging the couple for abuse.
In the case of the unfortunate couple the right course for them to straighten out their son from his pranks was to approach the child protection service and they would have arranged a psychiatrist to attend the child. In this case the child wetted in his pants in school bus and knowing this his father reprimanded that he would be sent back to India if he did that again. The poor child fearing about his father's warning told his class teacher about it. The class teacher must have probed furher his life at home and he told his woes. The class teacher informed it the C P S.
Living in Norway and knowing their strict rules of child protection, it was fate that Chandrasekhar has fallen prey to the system.
In the case of the unfortunate couple the right course for them to straighten out their son from his pranks was to approach the child protection service and they would have arranged a psychiatrist to attend the child. In this case the child wetted in his pants in school bus and knowing this his father reprimanded that he would be sent back to India if he did that again. The poor child fearing about his father's warning told his class teacher about it. The class teacher must have probed furher his life at home and he told his woes. The class teacher informed it the C P S.
Living in Norway and knowing their strict rules of child protection, it was fate that Chandrasekhar has fallen prey to the system.
It is not known whether the entire welfare system is
functioning true to its letter and spirit or the individual vagaries of its service men affect the up keep and
comfort of the children in their custody. Any way the concept of child protection
from abuse is a noble endeavor and no nation in the world has similar welfare system
for children.
When the parents themselves abuse their children who will
look after them? Norway’s child protection
service emerged from that thought and the State arranged Machinery to look in
to it. It has to be assumed that the overall functioning of the is satisfactory because Norway
is a country with high ‘human development index’ and child welfare is an
important parameter in calculating the H D I. However there are complaints about the functioning of C P S. For example,while Norway preach the importance of children living with their parents, the child protection people have little qualms in snatching away children from the custody of parents on silly charges..
The present
case of snatching child from the parental custody and sentencing parents for
imprisonment for over a year is an extreme case. Why the problem could not have been solved by
properly warning the couple and explaining to them the consequences, is eluding a
convincing answer.
No comments:
Post a Comment