The Wharton India
economic forum or WIEF, was established in Wharton school in 1966 to promote’
India’s limitless potential and possibilities’. It is a students’ run
economic forum focusing on India. It conducts meetings which are attended by
prominent Indians in various fields like Government, Industry, media,
entertainment and others. This year they invited Gujarat chief Minister Sri.Narendra
Mody for the key-note address. There were reports that Sri Mody would address
via video and that he was sprucing up
his English to make a memorable speech.
However, a couple of days after the W I E F informed Sri.Mody’s office that
the invitation was cancelled. They said that they got a letter signed by
three Professors of Pennsylvania University along with endorsements of 135
persons objecting Sri Mody addressing the forum on grounds that he was instrumental to the riots in Gujarat
and the U.S. still had not issued Visa for him on that ground. The letter
discussed the Gujarat issues in detail and the signatories of the letter were said
‘furious’ at the invitation.
Obviously the W I E F did not expect a division of opinion while inviting Sri Mody especially from Penn University under which the Wharton school functions. The Wharton
school feared a show down at the meeting and they said that they did not want a division of
opinions in the meeting which would ultimately show both Mr.Mody and the W I E F in poor light.
The decision to cancel speech of Sri Mody by the students on that premises is reasonable. If arguments and angry exchanges broke out in the conference it would be embarrassing for all concerned. However this act of invitation and rejection afterwards is not a good practice for a responsible body and they should have evaluated all possible consequences before invitation sent..
The decision to cancel speech of Sri Mody by the students on that premises is reasonable. If arguments and angry exchanges broke out in the conference it would be embarrassing for all concerned. However this act of invitation and rejection afterwards is not a good practice for a responsible body and they should have evaluated all possible consequences before invitation sent..
But it certainly shows the famed Pennsylvania University in poor light when it exhibits intolerance and lack of willingness to hear different views. After all what was expected from Sri Mody in the conference was only a video speech in which Sri Mody will explain industrial opportunities in India for the American business community, quite an harmless speech at that and an opposition for such an innocuous affair can stem only from politics. It should not have happened in the U S where freedom of speech is thought to be protected dearly.
The end result is, while the Penn University’s intolerance comes
to light, Sri Mody gets more votes out
of sympathy in the next election.
No comments:
Post a Comment